Competitive Analysis

Compare contracts,
not slogans.

Agent-memory products expose different data, retrieval, and operations contracts. SuperLocalMemory combines a local core data path with public research preprints and release-linked verification gates.

Evaluation Matrix

Evidence required before ranking products.

Competitor behavior, pricing, licenses, and benchmarks change. This page defines the same verification questions for every system instead of publishing an unversioned winner table.

Dimension Current SLM contract Proof required for any product
Retrieval Five candidate producers, fusion, optional reranking, graph and Fisher-informed enhancement Frozen corpus, channel traces, relevance labels, and raw outputs
Score meaning Score Contract v2; answer confidence is null while calibration is pending Field definitions, held-out calibration, selective-risk, ECE, and Brier reports
Data path Mode A local core; optional providers, connectors, backup, proxies, and downloads are separate Complete configured flow, retention, erasure, logs, and provider terms
Cache Exact cache opt-in; semantic cache experimental False-hit, invalidation, tenant-isolation, latency, and provider-accounting evidence
Compression Safe JSON/code paths may yield no reduction; aggressive prose is opt-in and lossy Declared corpus, tokenizer, ratio, round trip, quality, and latency artifacts
Scale No current V4 capacity or constant-latency claim Hardware, corpus, concurrency, ingest, p50/p95/p99, quality, disk, RAM, and recovery
Client support Named configurations; verified count not yet published Install, session, remember, recall, update, forget, restart, upgrade, and uninstall

Current competitor comparisons must be regenerated from live primary sources and release-linked artifacts before publication. The historical SLM methodology remains in arXiv:2603.14588.

SLM evidence boundary

Three contracts you can inspect.

Public preprints, source code, and a V4 ledger make the evidence boundary inspectable.

01 · Retrieval

Traceable retrieval

Dense candidate generation uses cosine similarity. Later fusion, reranking, graph enhancement, and Fisher-informed terms are separately visible in runtime diagnostics when available.

02 · Privacy

Explicit local-first boundary

Mode A can run core memory operations without a cloud model-provider call. Optional providers, connectors, backup, proxies, model downloads, and dependency acquisition have separate network behavior.

03 · Evidence

Public research record

Three public arXiv preprints document versioned experiments. They are not venue-reviewed, and historical results are not current V4 measurements.

Questions

Fair questions about this comparison.